CPS documentary published in 2013

PAPA People Assisting Parents Association

© 2007-now
Bookmark and Share
PAPA logo
notice board blogger icon
New links

On 14 July 2015, the Supreme Court of B.C. handed down an unprecedented judgment J.P. v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2015 BCSC 1216. This is the first case in Canadian legal history in which child protection workers are found liable for misfeasance in public office, breach of fiduciary duty and breach of the standard of care. Findings therein confirm our views and support the merit of our cause. Continuous litigations between JP and the MCFD are summarized in JP Aftermath. Our commentary on the Plecas Review Part 1: Decision Time was published on 4 January 2016. If you have evidence of misfeasance or abuse of children in foster care, please come forward and contact us.
Our site contains vast amount of information on child protective services (CPS). Please hover your mouse over the navigation icons below to access the most frequently sought information by various categories of browsers.
parents must read
  1. MCFD Tactics
  2. MCFD Surveillance
  3. MCFD found liable for misfeasance
  4. Psychotherapy
  5. Flaws of CFCSA
  6. Absolute Power and Corruption
  7. Myths & Reality
  8. On-line Service Application
Media
  1. MCFD found liable for misfeasance
  2. MCFD Tactics
  3. MCFD Surveillance
  4. MCFD & The First Nation
  5. Unreported Deaths of Albertan Foster Children
  6. Child Removal and Human Organ Harvesting
  7. Empirical and Statistical Data
  8. Child Removal Cases
  9. Video Archives
contact us
most popular
  1. MCFD found liable for misfeasance
  2. MCFD & The First Nation
  3. The Child Protection Industry
  4. Unreported Deaths of Albertan Foster Children
  5. Our Comment on "When Talk Trumped Service"
  6. "The problem with Children’s Aid Societies" by Barbara Kay for National Post
  7. Powerful As God (2011 documentary)
  8. CPS Quotas: How Child Protective Services is Incentivized To Take Children video
  9. Documentary on the Child Protection Industry
  10. "The Child Abuse Laws Which Could Destroy Your Reputation"
  11. 3-part WLKY Target 32 Investigates (Kentucky, U.S.A.):
    1. "CPS Makes Shocking Allegations at 2 Moms Part 1 of 3"
    2. "CPS Does About Face, Accuses Parents Of Abuse Part 2 of 3"
    3. "CPS Makes More Disturbing Allegations Against Parents Part 3 of 3"
  12. "Child Protective System WLKY Louisville Part 1"; and
    "Child Protective System WLKY Louisville Part 2"
  13. Documentary on the Ministry of Children and Family Development Part 1 and Part 2
  14. "The Negative Effects of Foster Care on Removed Children" (Wikipedia)
  15. "Mass CPS corruption Part 2"
  16. "Deconstructing America Part 1" "Deconstructing America Part 2"
  17. "Death of a foster child Dontel Jeffers, Dorchester, Massachusetts, U.S.A. (Part 1)" "(Part 2)" ABC News
  18. U.S. Republican Senator Nancy Schaefer spoke on "child protective service" (CPS) corruption video
  19. "Children's Aid Society workers should be reined in" National Post
  20. Wrongful Removal of Christina Harrison's Baby
  21. Jessica Laboy case
  22. Removal of the 13 Gates Children in Texas, U.S.A.
  23. "Married to the State: How government colonizes the family"
    by Professor Stephen Baskerville (September 2009)

Financial Incentives to Special Interests and Burden on Taxpayers

  1. According to the findings of "2006 B.C. Budget" published by a Vancouver accounting firm in February 2006, each removed child cost taxpayers $65,000 per year on program delivery alone in 2001 (ie. fees paid to foster parents, counseling, psychologists, day care centres). The costs will increase substantially if legal costs of opposing parties, court and police expenses in attending to "child protection" matters are included.

  2. Based on information obtained through the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, foster parenting is a 9-figure industry in British Columbia each year.

  3. Teresa Iezzi 1 State-sponsored child removal activities expose taxpayers to lawsuits and contingent liabilities. Sometimes, MCFD's foster parents could end up suing MCFD (to be more precise taxpayers) for damages. A former foster parent in Burnaby, British Columbia, Teresa Iezzi, went public to The Province on May 11, 2009, just one day before the provincial election. She alleged that she contracted Hepatitis C from an attack of foster child under her care and her foster parenting contract was terminated by MCFD as a result of this. She is seeking apology and financial compensation of an unspecified amount from MCFD. It is noteworthy to remark that she was earning $7,500 per month, which was her main source of income while fostering children removed by MCFD. Assuming that her income was the same at the onset of her fostering business 22 years ago, she had earned $1,980,000 from taxpayers.

    This lucrative industry has attracted many service providers whose primary interest is to make money. The well being of children is often irrelevant to them.

  4. Federal government created the following tax and financial incentives to remove children:

    Children's Special Allowances (CSA, a tax-free monthly federal payment made to agencies, institutions and foster parents who are responsible for the care and education of children under 18 who physically reside in Canada and who are not in the care of their parents) as governed by the Children’s Special Allowances Act (1992, c. 48, Sch.). To special interests in the "child protection" and the adoption industry, this is one of the main sources where the big money comes from.

    According to the figures provided by Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat in Table 2.1 below, CSA payments are in 9-digit figures and are rising every year. CSA is also a financial incentive for provincial "child protection" agencies to remove children from their parents and keep them in government sponsored foster/group homes as long as possible.

    The 2011 federal budget announced on 6 June 2011 stipulates that for 2012 and subsequent years, the payment of a CSA to an agency (such as MCFD) in respect of a child who is a former Crown ward and who has been placed in the custody of a legal guardian, tutor (in Quebec) or a similar caregiver and the agency provides financial assistance for the maintenance of the child. This Budget would ensure that an agency receives the CSA in respect of a child that it continues to financially support even if the child has been released to the care of a court-appointed guardian, tutor or similar caregiver.

    This extended payment of CSA will further create financial incentive to remove and adopt children.

  5. Child protection and the adoption industries are very lucrative to some special interest groups.
    2002/2003 2003/2004 2004/2005 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008
    Age # of removal # of removal # of removal # of removal # of removal # of removal
    0 489 440 520 643 661 626
    1 229 199 228 267 223 259
    2 205 201 195 243 239 194
    3 222 167 212 209 187 150
    4 180 182 222 221 158 141
    5 185 156 178 163 164 147
    6 174 155 180 174 131 152
    7 181 157 166 183 125 130
    8 169 170 189 173 124 146
    9 166 161 152 176 154 140
    10 155 127 157 145 135 125
    11 159 154 138 164 150 158
    12 152 143 149 155 152 145
    13 174 145 145 153 138 152
    14 175 163 151 151 165 125
    15 172 143 139 107 125 116
    16 111 70 79 84 81 68
    17 55 37 23 42 34 34
    18 5 6 7 5 5 5
    19 1 1
    total 3,358 2,977 3,230 3,458 3,151 3,014
    age median 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 4.5

    Data obtained from MCFD by way of an application through the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act in 2009.

    The age median in these years are within the range of 4.5 and 5.5. The age group that has the highest frequency of removal is consistently under 1 year of age in these six fiscal years studied.



  6. According to MCFD's news release dated January 9, 2009, the budget for British Columbia’s Child and Youth Mental Health (CYMH) Plan was doubled over the last several years to $84 million annually. Almost 300 new staff were hired across the province. Nearly 20,000 B.C. children and youth receive MCFD outpatient and community mental health services annually – almost double the number that received services in 2004. As usual, opposition NDP Critics Ms. Jenny Kwan, MLA immediately criticized the B.C. Liberal government that they are not doing enough to protect children. The research that led to this ministry decision alleged that approximately 140,000 children and youth experience mental disorders causing significant distress and impairing their functioning at home, at school, with peers, or in the community in B.C.

    2006 census children age distribution

    MCDF news release did not indicate the age range of the children and youth who allegedly suffer mental disorders. Assuming that they are under 15 of age (for the sake of simplicity given the statistics above), the percentage of those who allegedly need mental health services is 21% (= 140,000/670,980). This means more than 1 out of 5 children need mental health services in B.C. We will leave it to our readers to decide whether they find this exceptionally high percentage believable. If this high ratio is indeed true, B.C. is certainly not the "best place on Earth" as the best place on Earth should not have generated so many children who need mental health services.

    As demonstrated in this case, the typical mechanism of how special interest groups who target government spending to market their services is as follows:

    • use a rare and extreme case to stir up attention, occupy the moral high ground and suggest the need to act;
    • hire some "experts" to conduct a review or an external organization to do some research to show objectiveness and impartiality;
    • allege a huge need to achieve certain objectives to justify the demand of various services, hence creating a rationale;
    • use the foregoing as an excuse to create or to increase a budget and implement the recommendations of the research to distribute wealth to special interest groups;
    • tell people how much government has accomplished to reap the political benefits.

While taxpayers and, at times, the alleged beneficiaries are victimized, this creates an all-win situation to those in government and service providers. This also explains that when more tax dollars dumped in, there will be more cases of "child abuse" in a money-driven market dictated by service providers and an ever accommodating government who lacks the political will to rectify the situation for obvious reasons. This works exceptionally well in an issue in which most people are unaware of the true nature and perceive that problems, if they ever exist, do not concern them. Be mindful that the total number of children removed and kept in government "care" amounts to a very small percentage of the total population in B.C. and only 23% [(474,895 x 2)/ 4,054,605] of British Columbians have children living in their households (based on 2006 Census data).



[This page was separated from the "Empirical Data & Stats" page on 20 October 2010, last revised on 5 August 2011.]