Elizabeth Mort's wrongful infant removal due to false positive drug test done without knowledge of unsuspecting mother. She sued the county and the hospital. Her case settled in 2013 and she was awarded $143,500.

PAPA People Assisting Parents Association

© 2007-now
Bookmark and Share
PAPA logo
notice board blogger icon
New links

On 14 July 2015, the Supreme Court of B.C. handed down an unprecedented judgment J.P. v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2015 BCSC 1216. This is the first case in Canadian legal history in which child protection workers are found liable for misfeasance in public office, breach of fiduciary duty and breach of the standard of care. Findings therein confirm our views and support the merit of our cause. Continuous litigations between JP and the MCFD are summarized in JP Aftermath. Our commentary on the Plecas Review Part 1: Decision Time was published on 4 January 2016. If you have evidence of misfeasance or abuse of children in foster care, please come forward and contact us.
Our site contains vast amount of information on child protective services (CPS). Please hover your mouse over the navigation icons below to access the most frequently sought information by various categories of browsers.
parents must read
  1. MCFD Tactics
  2. MCFD Surveillance
  3. MCFD found liable for misfeasance
  4. Psychotherapy
  5. Flaws of CFCSA
  6. Absolute Power and Corruption
  7. Myths & Reality
  8. On-line Service Application
Media
  1. MCFD found liable for misfeasance
  2. MCFD Tactics
  3. MCFD Surveillance
  4. MCFD & The First Nation
  5. Unreported Deaths of Albertan Foster Children
  6. Child Removal and Human Organ Harvesting
  7. Empirical and Statistical Data
  8. Child Removal Cases
  9. Video Archives
contact us
most popular
  1. MCFD found liable for misfeasance
  2. MCFD & The First Nation
  3. The Child Protection Industry
  4. Unreported Deaths of Albertan Foster Children
  5. Our Comment on "When Talk Trumped Service"
  6. "The problem with Children’s Aid Societies" by Barbara Kay for National Post
  7. Powerful As God (2011 documentary)
  8. CPS Quotas: How Child Protective Services is Incentivized To Take Children video
  9. Documentary on the Child Protection Industry
  10. "The Child Abuse Laws Which Could Destroy Your Reputation"
  11. 3-part WLKY Target 32 Investigates (Kentucky, U.S.A.):
    1. "CPS Makes Shocking Allegations at 2 Moms Part 1 of 3"
    2. "CPS Does About Face, Accuses Parents Of Abuse Part 2 of 3"
    3. "CPS Makes More Disturbing Allegations Against Parents Part 3 of 3"
  12. "Child Protective System WLKY Louisville Part 1"; and
    "Child Protective System WLKY Louisville Part 2"
  13. Documentary on the Ministry of Children and Family Development Part 1 and Part 2
  14. "The Negative Effects of Foster Care on Removed Children" (Wikipedia)
  15. "Mass CPS corruption Part 2"
  16. "Deconstructing America Part 1" "Deconstructing America Part 2"
  17. "Death of a foster child Dontel Jeffers, Dorchester, Massachusetts, U.S.A. (Part 1)" "(Part 2)" ABC News
  18. U.S. Republican Senator Nancy Schaefer spoke on "child protective service" (CPS) corruption video
  19. "Children's Aid Society workers should be reined in" National Post
  20. Wrongful Removal of Christina Harrison's Baby
  21. Jessica Laboy case
  22. Removal of the 13 Gates Children in Texas, U.S.A.
  23. "Married to the State: How government colonizes the family"
    by Professor Stephen Baskerville (September 2009)

Elizabeth Mort and Alex Rodriguez Losing a Baby Over a Poppy Seed (April 2010)

Elizabeth Mort and her partner Alex Rodriguez of New Castle, Pennsylvania lost their 3-day old infant to Lawrence County Children and Youth Services (LCCYS) due to a false positive drug test conducted in the hospital without her consent and knowledge. Their infant was removed from their home the day after they left the hospital by social workers escorted by the police. Later, it was discovered that the false positive drug test done without the knowledge of parents was caused by the poppy seeds in an “everything” bagel from Dunkin’ Donuts. Their infant was returned after 5 days.

On October 28, 2010, parents commenced legal actions against LCCYS, Jameson Hospital and the social worker in the Pennsylvania Western District Court (MORT et al v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES et al). Their lawsuit is launched with the assistance of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania. The complaint statement filed is archived below.




This case suggests the following:

  1. The witch hunt network in the "child protection" industry is extensive. Unsuspecting parents can easily fall prey for the wrong reasons.
  2. Unlike what government officials or top dogs of "child protection" agencies often say to the media that child removal decision is not made lightly, children are often removed first and do investigation later. Child removal as the last resort is a propaganda designed to mitigate public resistance and to render the most intrusive, oppressive activity seemingly reasonable.
  3. Flaws in medical diagnosis are often ignored by tunnel view "child protection" social workers.
  4. Taxpayers are exposed to contingent liabilities by the activities of "child protection" social workers because of the indemnity from their employer, ie. the government.
  5. Parents and children are powerless against the formidable "child protection" agency.
  6. Despite so many atrocities and problems, there are naive people still believe that child removal should be allowed (see the TV debate on this case in the video on the top left hand corner of this page).
  7. Although there is no law prohibiting drug addicts from raising children, child protection law allows authorities to remove their children at will. This amounts to an unwritten law barring junkies from raising kids.


[This page was added on added on 17 November 2010, last revised on 28 September 2011.]