PAPA People Assisting Parents Association

© 2007-now
Bookmark and Share
PAPA logo
donate button
notice board blogger icon
New links

On 14 July 2015, the Supreme Court of B.C. handed down an unprecedented judgment J.P. v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2015 BCSC 1216. This is the first case in Canadian legal history in which child protection workers are found liable for misfeasance in public office, breach of fiduciary duty and breach of the standard of care. Litigations between JP and the MCFD are summarized in JP Aftermath. Our commentary on the Plecas Review Part 1: Decision Time was published on 4 January 2016. On 31 August 2017, the Court of Appeal for B.C. set aside the orders in the civil proceeding against the Director/Province, set aside the finding that Mr. Strickland committed misfeasance in public office, that the Director and her delegates breached their fiduciary duty to the children, and that the Director and her delegates breached the standard of care in the decisions they made with respect to the children while they were in her care.
Our site contains vast amount of information on child protective services (CPS). Please hover your mouse over the navigation icons below to access the most frequently sought information by various categories of browsers.
parents must read
  1. MCFD Tactics
  2. MCFD Surveillance
  3. MCFD found liable for misfeasance
  4. Psychotherapy
  5. Flaws of CFCSA
  6. Absolute Power and Corruption
  7. Myths & Reality
  8. On-line Service Application
  1. MCFD found liable for misfeasance
  2. MCFD Tactics
  3. MCFD Surveillance
  4. MCFD & The First Nation
  5. Unreported Deaths of Albertan Foster Children
  6. Child Removal and Human Organ Harvesting
  7. Empirical and Statistical Data
  8. Child Removal Cases
  9. Video Archives
contact us
most popular
  1. MCFD found liable for misfeasance
  2. MCFD & The First Nation
  3. The Child Protection Industry
  4. Unreported Deaths of Albertan Foster Children
  5. Our Comment on "When Talk Trumped Service"
  6. "The problem with Children’s Aid Societies" by Barbara Kay for National Post
  7. Powerful As God (2011 documentary)
  8. CPS Quotas: How Child Protective Services is Incentivized To Take Children video
  9. Documentary on the Child Protection Industry
  10. "The Child Abuse Laws Which Could Destroy Your Reputation"
  11. 3-part WLKY Target 32 Investigates (Kentucky, U.S.A.):
    1. "CPS Makes Shocking Allegations at 2 Moms Part 1 of 3"
    2. "CPS Does About Face, Accuses Parents Of Abuse Part 2 of 3"
    3. "CPS Makes More Disturbing Allegations Against Parents Part 3 of 3"
  12. "Child Protective System WLKY Louisville Part 1"; and
    "Child Protective System WLKY Louisville Part 2"
  13. Documentary on the Ministry of Children and Family Development Part 1 and Part 2
  14. "The Negative Effects of Foster Care on Removed Children" (Wikipedia)
  15. "Mass CPS corruption Part 2"
  16. "Deconstructing America Part 1" "Deconstructing America Part 2"
  17. "Death of a foster child Dontel Jeffers, Dorchester, Massachusetts, U.S.A. (Part 1)" "(Part 2)" ABC News
  18. U.S. Republican Senator Nancy Schaefer spoke on "child protective service" (CPS) corruption video
  19. "Children's Aid Society workers should be reined in" National Post
  20. Wrongful Removal of Christina Harrison's Baby
  21. Jessica Laboy case
  22. Removal of the 13 Gates Children in Texas, U.S.A.
  23. "Married to the State: How government colonizes the family"
    by Professor Stephen Baskerville (September 2009)

MCFD and the Psychotherapy Industry

Opinions from a Dissident Practitioner

Dr. Tana Dineen is a former licensed psychologist in Ontario and British Columbia who spoke very critically of her own profession. In her speech to the Vancouver Family Law Sections of the Canadian Bar Association on the topic "Psychologists and Section 15 (Custody Evaluation) Reports: Illusions of Expertise, Ethics and Objectivity" (6 May 1998), simply stated that:

  1. psychology is an industry masquerading as a profession,
  2. this industry is aggressively targeting the judicial and legal systems as growth markets for its services.
  3. the current business formula of this industry is:


  4. trusting psychologists is so dangerous to the Justice System that judicial skepticism is not only warranted but urgently needed!

She further stated:

"Psychologists generally consider themselves to be experts in each and every aspect of life, for as George Albee, a past president of American Psychological Association (APA) put it: "our social problems are all human problems, and we (psychologists) are the experts on this." Resonating this view and embellishing it, Frank Farley a recent president of the APA wrote that psychology "may be in the process of re-inventing itself as the primary discipline in the solution of humanity's major problems... Psychology can do much to improve the world."

"Like most industries, it is focused on:

  • protecting its own interests by creating licenses and monopolies;
  • expanding its market by developing new areas of service;
  • increasing its influence by entering courts and lobbying governments."

Incidentally, her views echo that of the Scottish psychiatrist Dr. Ronald David Laing (7 October 1927 – 23 August 1989) who wrote in his book "The Politics of Experience and the Bird of Paradise" (1967):

"We are effectively destroying ourselves with violence masquerading as love"

Dr. Liang was critical in his own profession psychiatry. He challenged psychiatric diagnosis for contradicting accepted medical procedure. Diagnosis is made on the basis of behavior or conduct. Examination and ancillary tests, if ever done at all, that traditionally precede the diagnosis of viable pathologies occurred after the diagnosis of mental disorder. Hence, according to Dr. Laing, psychiatry was founded on a false epistemology: illness diagnosed by conduct, but treated biologically.

The presence of people like Dr. Tana Dineen and Dr. Ronald Laing suggests that:

  1. In every community, even among special interests, there are honest people with a good conscience to speak the truth.
  2. The fate of these honest people, if they blow the whistle and jeopardize the interests of the cartel, are predictably miserable. Their views are often, if not always, labeled as biased, radical, unreliable or wrong. They are denounced and rejected by their peers to protect the industry. They will most likely become an outcast in their governing body and be detested by those whose interests they challenge.
  3. The presence of these honest service providers is insufficient to rectify the corruption (by definition rendering it structural) in the "child protection" business.

[This page was conceptualized on 20 April 2011, published on 4 July 2012, last revised 24 March 2015, accessible to the public on 14 October 2013.]